Regioselective sulfation

ABSTRACT

A direct method is disclosed for the regioselective sulfation of an organic molecule having optionally derivatized hydroxyl groups on at least two adjacent carbon atoms. The method comprises the treatment of a di-(optionally substituted alkyl and/or aryl) stannylene acetal derivative of the molecule with an electrophilic sulfating agent, preferably sulfur trioxide/trimethylamine. The disclosed method is useful for the selective sulfation of a variety of mono-, di- and oligosaccharides. Novel saccharides prepared according to this method are also disclosed.

This application is a 371 of PCT/EP95/03034 filed Jul. 27, 1995 published as WO96/03413 Feb. 8, 1996.

This invention relates to regioselective sulfation; more particularly, various sulfated organic molecules, some of which are novel, have been synthesised by a sulfation method via regioselective activation of the organic molecules to certain diorganostannylene acetals, followed by treatment with electrophilic sulfating agents.

Specifically, the present invention provides a direct method for the regioselective sulfation of an organic molecule having optionally derivatized hydroxyl groups at least on two adjacent carbon atoms characterised in that it comprises the treatment of a di -(optionally substituted alkyl and/or aryl) stannylene acetal derivative thereof with an electrophilic sulfating agent.

Conventional electrophilic sulfating agents may be used for the present purposes, for example sulfur trioxide/amino-base, such as pyridine or triethylamine, but sulfur trioxide/trimethylamine is preferred. The sulfation is conveniently effected at room temperature, e.g. 20°-25° C., in a suitable organic solvent, such as dioxane or THF. Of course, higher temperatures may be used if desired, depending upon the choice of solvent.

The present method involves the treatment of a stannylene acetal derivative of the starting material. Such derivatives are di- (optionally substituted alkyl and/or aryl substituted. In the case of an alkyl substituent, it is preferred that it contain up to six carbon atoms, while phenyl is an example of a suitable aryl substituent. Either may itself be substituted by one or more non-interfering substituents, e.g. alkoxyl. The substitution of the stannylene acetal derivatives may be dialkyl or diaryl or it may be alkyl - aryl. In a presently-preferred embodiment, a dibutylstannylene acetal derivative is used.

Generally, the present method may be carried out by conventional means, but an immobilised system may also be envisaged.

The starting material for the present method is an organic molecule having optionally derivatized hydroxyl groups at least on two adjacent carbon atoms. For example, ether-derivatization of one of the two hydroxyl groups may influence selectivity, more particularly in that the sulfate group would tend to be directed to the other position. More specifically, a 3'-sulfate would be expected to result from a galactoside or lactoside, while a 2'-sulfate may be obtained from a partially-protected maltoside.

In the absence of interfering substituents, the present methodology may be applied to a wide variety of such organic molecules. The presence of two hydroxyl groups in proximity, one of which is to be sulfated, is central to the present method. Saccharide chemistry is an instance where such selectivity may be important, particularly in view of the number of potentially-reactive hydroxyl groups. For example, the present method is well-suited to both poly- and oligo-saccharides, preferably containing no more than twenty, more preferably no more than six, repeating units. The advantages thereof are particularly apparent in relation to mono- and di- saccharides. The present method may be applied to glycoconjugates, such as glycolipids and glycopeptides, or to glycosaminoglycans. It should be noted that this methodology may also be used with analogues of the materials illustrated above, e.g. unnatural sugars, such as amino-sugars. As will be appreciated, there is no need to distinguish between natural and synthetic molecules or polymers.

In the exemplification of the present method, a number of novel compounds are identified below, specifically those numbered 14, 15, 16, 23, 25, 30, 32 and 34, and the present invention also relates thereto. As will be explained, compound 23 is of particular interest. Of course, such organic molecules may be conjugated to larger molecules and the present invention further relates thereto. This would also apply to other sulfate products of the present method.

One embodiment of the present invention concerns the regioselective sulfation of an oligosaccharide, preferably a mono- or di- saccharide, characterised in that it comprises the treatment of a dibutylstannylene acetal derivative thereof with sulfur trioxide/trimethylamine, a 3'-sulfate resulting from a galactoside or lactoside and a 2'-sulfate resulting from a partially-protected maltoside. Having discussed the present invention in general terms, it will now be further illustrated with particular reference to that exemplary embodiment.

In recent years, oligosaccharides and glycoconjugates containing sulfates and aminosulfonates have been isolated and characterised, and have been shown to play important roles in biological recognition processes. For example, 3'-O-sulfo-N-acetyllactosamide 1: ##STR1## is a partial structure for the 3'-O-sulfo-Lewis^(x) antigen which is recognised by E-selectins during the inflammatory response, (see, for example, Yuen, C. T., et al, Biochemistry, 31, 9126-9131, 1992; and Yuen C. T., et al, J. Biol. Chem., 269, 1595-1598; 1994). Compound 1 itself has been shown to be useful for detecting high levels of serum α-1,3-L-fucosyltransferase in ovarian cancer patients, since it is a selective substrate for this enzyme, (see, for example, Chadrasekaran, E. V., et al, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 23806-23814, 1992). Disaccharide 2: ##STR2## is a partial structure in heparan sulfate, which has recently been identified to be part of a specific basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) binding sequence, that participates in activation of bFGF and hence regulation of cell growth, (see, for example, Maccarana, M, et al, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 23898-23905, 1993). Galactosylceramide sulfatide 3: ##STR3## is a mammalian glycolipid, which has been isolated from spinal cord, (see, for example, Hara, A., and Radiu, N. S., Anal. Biochem., 100, 364-370, 1979).

The synthesis of natural sulfated oligosaccharides and of analogues containing various modifications is not trivial since it requires extensive protection and deprotection steps. For example, in the synthesis of structures related to 2, at least three orthogonal protection groups per monosaccharide unit have to be employed in synthesis: one for protecting the C-4 hydroxyl group, which needs to be selectively free for coupling; a second protecting group for those amino/hydroxyl groups which need to be sulfated during synthesis; and a third protecting group for those hydroxyl groups that remain free in the final product, (see, for example, Lubineau, A., et al, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1419-1420, 1993; and Nicolaou, K. C., et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 8843-8844, 1993). There is a need to develop synthetic methods for complex carbohydrates which minimise the use of protecting groups by the use of highly regioselective reagents and this has led to the development of regioselective sulfation using the well known dibutylstannylene acetals of glycosides as activated intermediates, (see, for example, Guilbert, B., et al, Tet. Lett., 35, 6563-6566, 1994).

Dibutyltin oxide is known to form five-, sometimes six- or seven-, membered cyclic dibutylstannylene acetals with saccharides, preferably with cis diol configurations, (see, for example, Tsuda, Y., et al, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 39, 2883-2887, 1991; and David, S and Hanessian, S., Tetrahedron, 41, 643-663, 1985). In such complexes, the nucleophilicity of one hydroxyl group is often enhanced, (see, for example, Nashed, M. A., and Anderson, L., Tet. Lett., 39, 3503-3506, 1976), towards acylation, alkylation, tosylation or silylation, (see, for example, David, S., and Hanessian, S., loc cit; Glen, A., et al, Carbohydr. Res., 248, 365-369, 1993; and Leigh D. A., et al, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 1373-1374, 1994). For example, the unprotected β-lactoside 4 was converted exclusively to the 3'-O-derivative 5 via the reaction of its 3',4'-dibutylstannylene acetal with allyl or benzyl bromide, (see, for example, Alais, J., et al, Tet. Lett., 24, 2383-2386, 1983; and Kartha, K. P. R., et al, J. Carbohydr. Chem., 8, 145-158, 1989): ##STR4##

In the case of silylation, the reversible migration of the stannylene acetal from the 3',4' positions to either the 4',6' or ring oxygen, 6' positions lead to the 6'-O-derivative, (see, for example, Glen, A., et al, loc cit; and Leigh, D. A., et al, loc cit). When using α-glycosides containing no cis diols, or when the cis diols are protected, the dibutylstannylene acetal may complex the 2 position and the anomeric oxygen to give the 2-O-derivative by reaction with an electrophile, (see, for example, Munavu, R. M., and Szmant, H. H., J. Org. Chem., 41, 1832-1836, 1976; and Tsuda, Y., et al, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 31, 1612-1624, 1983).

The regioselective sulfation of phenyl thio-β-lactoside 8 was initially studied, as it is easily obtained from bromolactose heptaacetate and thiophenol, (see, for example, Hudson, C. S., and Kunz, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 47, 2052-2055, 1925; and Tsvetkov, Y. E., et al, Carbohydr. Res. 115, 254-258, 1983), following by conventional deacetylation: ##STR5##

The stannylene acetal complex was prepared by stirring 8 with dibutyltin oxide in refluxing methanol and removing the solvent in vacuo. The initial aim was to introduce the sulfate in a protected form, such as the phenylsulfate group, which had already been used with saccharides, (see, for example, Takiura, K., and Honda, S., Yakugaku Sasshi, 87, 1248-1255, 1967; and Penney, C. L., and Perlin, A. S., Carbohydr. Res., 93, 241-246, 1981). Because of its structural similarity to phenylchlorosulfate, reactions with tosylchloride were first investigated, in order to establish that tosylation follows the same regioselectivity as acylation. Thus, the dry dibutylstannylene acetal prepared from 8 was treated with 15 equivalents of tosyl chloride and 0.5 equivalent of tetrabutyl ammonium bromide in refluxing THF. Bromide anions are known to activate the reaction by nucleophilic substitution on the tin complex, (see, for example, Alais, J., and Veyrieres, A., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I, 377-381, 1981). The reaction occurred readily giving the 3'-O-tosyl derivative 9 as the major isolated product (˜75%) and the 3',6'-di-O-tosyl lactoside 11 as the minor product (˜15% yield): ##STR6## The formation of 11 could be due to initial tosylation at the 3' position with migration of the stannylene acetal to activate the 6' position towards a second tosylation. The ¹ H NMR spectrum of 9 and 11 confirmed the presence of one and two tosyl groups, respectively, and the regioselectivity of tosylation was confirmed by the downfield shift of the 3'-H in 9 and of 3'-H and 6'-H in 11. Unambiguous characterisation of 9 and 11 was possible after peracetylation to 10 and 12, respectively. Thus, tosylation seemed to have occurred with similar regioselectivity as reported for benzylation and allylation (see, for example, Alais, J., et al, loc cit; and Kartha, K. P. R., et al, loc cit).

The next step was to look at the reaction of phenylchlorosulfate 13, (see, for example, Penney, C. L., and Perlin, A. S., loc cit), with the stannylene acetal of 8. However, analysis of the reaction mixture by thin layer chromatography revealed that the reaction had not gone to completion and that a mixture of products had been formed. Only compound 14 containing a 6'-O-sulfate group could be isolated from this mixture in ˜11% yield: ##STR7## 14 had presumably been formed by decomposition of the corresponding 6'-O-phenylsulfate. Thus, reaction of the stannylene acetal of 8 with phenyl chlorosulfate had shown less selectivity than the corresponding tosylation and had given as a main product the 6' isomer instead of the 3' sulfate. Since this might be explained by the lower reactivity of the phenylchlorosulfate, the reaction was repeated with the more reactive p-nitrophenylchlorosulfate, again with little success.

As a more reactive sulfation reagent, and one which should yield stable products, Me₃ N.SO₃ was chosen to react with the dibutylstannylene acetal of 8. This reaction proved to be unexpectedly successful. Thus, treatment with two equivalents of Me₃ N.SO₃ in dioxane at room temperature for 30 hours resulted in the conversion of the dibutylstannylene acetal of 8 to the 3'-O-sulfo-lactoside 15 (˜76%) and the 3',6'-di-O-sulfo-lactoside 16 (˜10%), both isolated as the sodium salts thereof:

    ______________________________________     Scheme 5     ______________________________________      ##STR8##     14       SO.sub.3 H  H           H     15       H           SO.sub.3 Na H     16       SO.sub.3 Na SO.sub.3 Na H     17       H           H           SO.sub.3 H     18       SO.sub.3 H  H           SO.sub.3 H     ______________________________________               isolated compounds (yields)     reaction conditions                 8       15     16    14   17   18     ______________________________________     i) Bu.sub.2 SnO, MeOH                 --      76%    10%   --   --   --     ii) Me.sub.3 N.SO.sub.3, dioxane     Me.sub.3 N.SO.sub.3, DMF                 13%     --     --    17%  9%   15%     ______________________________________

In this reaction addition of bromide anions was unnecessary as the trimethylamine presumably took the role of activating the tin complex towards electrophilic attack. The selectivity is the same as that observed with allyl, benzyl or tosyl halides and would be expected to proceed via the same 3',4' stannylene acetal intermediate. The presence of a sulfate group may be observed by NMR spectroscopy in that it causes a downfield shift of 3'-H and 4'-H to 4.01 and 3.87-3.89 ppm, respectively, (see, for example, Kogelberg, H., and Rutherford, T., Glycobiology, 4, 49-57, 1994), in 15 compared to 8, and also of 6'-H in 16. The structure of 15 was also confirmed by independent synthesis via an alternative conventional five step route from 8, which lead to a product having identical spectroscopic data.

Since Me₃ N.SO₃ may react with hydroxyl groups without the need for an added base, the reaction of 8 therewith was investigated to establish that the observed selectivity was indeed due to activation by the tin complex. Firstly, no reaction was observed with the lactoside 8 was merely stirred under similar conditions (in dioxane) with Me₃ N.SO₃, possibly due to the poor solubility of 8 in this solvent. However, sulfation proceeded when a solution of 8 in DMF was treated with two equivalents of Me₃ N.SO₃. Contrary to the previous reaction, a mixture of at least three products, 14, 17 and 18, in addition to starting material was formed, notably none of them containing a sulfate at the 3' position. This confirmed that activation by dibutyltin oxide was necessary for the observed regioselectivity of sulfation.

This methodology of selected sulfation was applied to the synthesis of sulfated N-acetyl lactosaminide 23, the thiophenyl glycoside of 1. Thiophenyl N-acetyllactosaminide 21 is not commercially available and was prepared by enzymatic galactosylation of 20 using β-1,4-galactosyltransferase from bovine milk. As an aside, it is interesting to note that it has previously been reported that 20 is not a substrate for this enzyme, (see, for example, Wong, C. H., et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 8137-8145, 1991), but gave 21 in good isolated yield (˜60%) using previously described procedures, (see, for example, Guilbert, B., and Flitsch, S. L., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I, 1181-1186, 1994; Wong, C. H., et al, J. Org. Chem., 47, 5416-5418, 1982; and Unverzagt, C., et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 9308-9309, 1990): ##STR9## These results might be due to the higher concentration of enzyme and acceptor (1 U/ml; 40 mM) as compared to the previous study (40 mU/ml; 25 mM). The 1,4 linkage in 21 was confirmed by NMR studies after acetylation. Treatment of 21 with acetic anhydride/pyridine at room temperature gave, after 45 hours, 22 which surprisingly contained free 3' and 4' hydroxyl groups. Nevertheless, the relevant ring protons in 22 showed a suitable spread of NMR signals to make NOE experiments possible. Upon acetylation of 21 to 22, the 4-H signal was not shifted downfield and irradiation of 1'-H and 6'-Hb at 4.38 ppm caused 4.7% enhancement of the 4-H signal and as expected of 5'-H, 3'-H (7%) and 6'-Ha (8%) confirming the existence of a 1,4-linkage in 22.

Sulfation of the dibutylstannylene acetal of 21 in THF with Me₃ N.SO₃ gave exclusively the 3'-O-sulfated compound 23 in 83% isolated yield. Interestingly, no formation of other side-products, as found for the sulfation of the corresponding lactoside 8, was observed. NMR and high resolution mass spectrometry data were in agreement with the 3' sulfated compound 23. The synthesis of 23 illustrates a particularly useful feature of the present sulfation method in that it may easily be combined with enzymatic methodologies.

The present sulfation method was further applied to the synthesis of various mono- and di-saccharides as exemplified in Table 1 below. Sulfation of the methyl β-galactoside 24 was very selective giving 25 in 93% isolated yield. The structure was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy (COSY) in the peracetylated derivitve 26. The method is also applicable to the synthesis of glycolipids, such as the sodium salt of 3. Thus, galactosylceramide 27 was selectivity sulfated in 97% isolated yield with a trace of the 3',6'-disulfated side-product 28 being formed. It is interesting to note that the allylic hydroxyl group on the ceramide did not react. The synthesis of glycolipids using glycosyltransferase enzymes has been described in WO 93/20226. The present method relates to the elaboration of such glycolipid structures where the sialic acid moiety may potentially be substituted by a sulfate. Such sulfated molecules may exhibit similar biological properties with the advantage of simple, less costly synthesis.

Also, the selective sulfation of maltosides, such as 29, 31 and 33, (see, for example, Davies, N. J., DPhil thesis, Oxford, 1994), were investigated in connection with the synthesis of heparan sulfate fragments, such as 2, (see, for example, Davies, N. J., and Flitsch, S. L., J. Chem. Soc., Perkins Trans I, 359-368, 1994). Selective sulfation at the desired 2' position of these maltosides to 30, 32 and 34, respectively, was indeed achieved in medium to good yields.

                                      TABLE 1     __________________________________________________________________________     Regioselective Sulfation of Various Saccharides Using the Present     Methodology     STARTING MATERIAL        PRODUCT (YIELD)     __________________________________________________________________________      ##STR10##                               ##STR11##      ##STR12##                               ##STR13##      ##STR14##                               ##STR15##     29; R = Bn, R' = CH.sub.2 OH                              30; R = Bn, R' = CH.sub.2 OH (87%)     allyl, R' = CO.sub.2 tert-Bu     allyl, R' = CO.sub.2 tert-Bu (54%)     allyl, R' = CH.sub.2 OSitert-BuMe.sub.2     allyl, R' = CH.sub.2 OSitert-BuMe.sub.2 (56%)     __________________________________________________________________________

In summary, it has been shown that the activation of selected hydroxyl groups in unprotected or partially protected saccharides by dibutyltin oxide may lead to selectively sulfated saccharides in good to excellent yields. The present methodology may be applied in the synthesis of a variety of natural products. It may be applicable to the sulfation of other hydroxyl groups, in particular for the synthesis of 6-sulfated saccharides, (see, for example, Hemmerich, S., and Rosen, S. D., Biochemistry, 33, 4830-4835, 1994) and to the sulfation of higher saccharides.

6-O-sulfation may be achieved by either varying the ligands on the tin, e.g. by using (Bu₃ Sn)₂ O as the activating reagent inwstead of Bu₂ SnO, or by varying the sulfation reagent Me₃ N.SO₃, as had already been shown when 13 was used as the sulfation reagent and 6-O-sulfation was achieved (see Scheme 4 above).

The present invention is further illustrated by the following.

EXPERIMENTAL

General--Reactions were carried out in solvents distilled from standard drying agents; thin layer chromatography was performed on aluminium sheets silica gel 60F₂₅₄ (Merck, layer thickness 0.2 mm); the components were detected by heating the TLC after spraying with a solution of 5% sulfuric acid-5% anisaldehyde in ethanol; silica gel C60 (Merck, 40-60 μm) was used for flash chromatography; NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AM-500 MHz, Varian Gemini 200 MHz or Bruker AM 200 MHz spectrometers using solvents as stated; Coupling constants J are in Herz: IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 1750 spectrometer and optical rotations on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter; mass spectrometry was carried out on VG Analytical Ltd, ZABIF or BIO-Q mass spectrometers using chemical impact (CI/NH₃), ammonia desorption chemical ionisation (DCI/NH₃), positive argon fast atom bombardment (FAB) and negative electrospray (ES⁻) as indicated; high resolution mass spectra were recorded on a VG AutospecEQ spectrometer (FAB⁻), Brucker FTICR using matrix assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI) or liquid secondary ionisation mass spectrometry (LSIMS) or by the EPSRC mass spectrometry service centre at Swansea; uridine 5'-diphospho-lgucose (UDP-glucose), uridine 5'-diphospho-glucose 4-epimerase (EC 5.1.3.2), β-1,4-galactosyltransferase from bovine milk (EC 2.4.1.22) and galactocerebroside (Type II, contains primarily nervonic acid) were purchased from Sigma; calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIAP) (EC 3.1.3.1) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim.

Phenyl 2,3,6-tri-O-acetyl-4-O-(2',3',4',6'-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 7:

A solution of heptaacetobromo-α-D-lactose (3.70 g, 5.29 mmol) in CH₃ CN (20 ml) was stirred with thiophenol (0.652 ml, 6.35 mmol) and thiethylamine (1.5 ml, 10.59 mmol) at room temperature for 18 hours. The reaction mixture was filtered, reduced in vacuo and purified by chromatography (CH₂ Cl₂ /Et₂ O 9:1) to give 7 as a white solid (3.24 g, 84%): α!²⁴ _(D) +5 (c 20 in CHCl₃); m.p. 161° C.: Rf 0.07 (CH₂ Cl₂ /Et₂ O 9:1); ν_(max) (CHCl₃)/cm⁻¹ 2902-2985 (CH), 1753 (CO); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CDCl₃) 1.96 and 2.03 (6H, 2×s, 2×Ac), 2.04 (6H, 2×s, 2×Ac), 2.09, 2.11, 2.15 (9H, 3×s, 3×Ac), 3.64 (1H, ddd, J 2.0, 5.6, 9.9, 5-H), 3.75 (1H, dd, J 9.5, 9.5, 4-H), 3.86 (1H, ddd, J, 1.0, 7.3, 7.3, 5'-H), 4.05-4.14 (3H, m, 6-Ha, 6'-Ha, 6'-Hb), 4.48 (1H, d, J 7.9, 1'-H), 4.53 (1H, dd, J 2.0, 11.9, 6-Hb), 4.68 (1H, d, J 10.1, 1-H), 4.90 (1H, dd, J 9.6, 9.6, 2-H), 4.95 (1H, dd, J 3.4, 10.4, 3'-H), 5.10 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 10.4, 2'-H), 5.22 (1H, dd, J 9.1, 9.1, 3-H), 5.34 (1H, dd, J 0.9, 3.4, 4'-H), 7.28-7.33 (3H, m, Ph), 7.43-7.50 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (50 MHz, CDCl₃) 20.35, 20.47, 20.62 (7 CH₃), 60.79, and 62.10 (2 CH2), 66.59, 69.04, 69.93, 70.21, 70.74, 73.82, 76.13, and 76.55 (8 CH), 85.45 (1-C), 101.08 (1'-C), 128.45 (CH, Ph), 129.06 (2 CH, Ph), 131.93 (C), 133.05 and 133.17 (2 CH, Ph), 169.31, 169.83, 169.98, 170.32 and 170.42 (5 CO), 170.60 (CO); m/z(DCI) 746 (MNH₄ ⁺, 7%), 331 (M-397)⁺, 100!.

Phenyl 1-deoxy-4-O-(β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 8:

To a solution of 7 (3.23 g, 4.43 mmol) in CH₂ Cl₂ /MeOH (1:1.4, 24 ml) was added a 0.2M sodium methoxide solution (8.85 ml, 1.77 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1.7 h, neutralized with amberlite IR-120 (H) resin, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to 5 ml leading to the precipitation of 8 as a white solid which was collected by filtration (1.58 g, 82%). The filtrate was reduced in vacuo and chromatographed (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1) to give compound 8 (222 mg, 12%): α!²⁴ _(D) -44.3 (c 1.5 in MeOH); m.p. 126° C.; Rf 0.33 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3402 (OH), 2940-2880 (CH); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.28 (1H, dd, J 8.6, 9.6, 2-H), 3.43-3.46 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.48 (1H, dd, J 3.3, 9.7, 3'-H), 3.52-3.59 (4H, m, 3-H, 4-H, 2'-H, 5'-H), 3.69 (1H, dd, J 4.6, 11.5, 6'-Ha), 3.77 (1H, dd, J 7.5, 11.5, 6'-Hb), 3.81 (1H, d, J 3.2, 4'-H), 3.83 (1H, dd, J 4.3, 12.3, 6-Ha), 3.90 (1H, dd, J 2.5, 12.3, 6-Hb), 4.36 (1H, d, J 7.6, 1'-H), 4.61 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.24-7.32 (3H, m, Ph), 7.54-7.57 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (50 MHz, CD₃ OD) 61.39 and 61.92 (2 CH₂), 69.78, 72.02, 72.90, 74.24, 76.58, 77.45, 79.63, 80.01 (8 CH), 88.66 (1-C), 104.39 (1'-C), 128.10 (CH, Ph), 129.55 (2 CH, Ph), 132.63 (2 CH, Ph), 134.28 (C, Ph); m/z (FAB⁺) Found: 457.1145 (MNa⁺), C₁₈ H₂₆ O₁₀ SNa⁺ requires 457.1144.

Phenyl 1-deoxy-1-thio-4-O-(3'-O-p-toluenesulfonyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-.beta.-D-glucopyranoside 9 and Phenyl 1-deoxy-1-thio-4-O-(3'-6'-di-O-p-toluenesulfonyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside 11:

Compound 8 (50 mg, 115 μmol) and Bu₂ SnO (43 mg, 169 μmol) were stirred in refluxing MeOH (1 ml), under nitrogen for 1 hours. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the dry dibutylstannylene complex was dissolved in THF (1 ml), Bu₄ NBr (18.5 mg, 58 μmol) and p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (329 mg, 1.72 mmol) were added and the mixture heated under reflux for 1 hours. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue chromatographed (CH₂ Cl₂ /MeOH 10:1) to give some starting material (4.7 mg, 9%), 9 as a colorless oil containing some butylstannyl derivatives (54.5 mg, ˜75%) and 11 which was chromatographed again twice (CH₂ Cl₂ /Et₂ O 10:1, then CH₂ Cl₂ /Et₂ O 17:1) leading to a colourless gum (12.8 mg, 15%): 9: Rf 0.09 (MeOH/CH₂ Cl₂ 1:10); ν_(max) (CDCl₃)/cm⁻¹ 3369 (OH), 2966, 2878 (CH), 1599 (C═C), 1354, 1177 (SO₂): δ_(H) (500 MHz; CDCl₃) 2.38 (3H, s, Me), 3.27 (1H, m, OH), 3.43-3.45 (2H, m, 2-H, 5-H), 3.58-3.59 (1H, m, 5'-H), 3.67-3.72 (2H, m, 3-H, 4-H), 3.80-3.88 (4H, m, 6-Ha, 6-Hb, 6'-Ha, 6'-Hb), 3.97 (1H, dd, J 9.1, 13.2, 2'-H), 4.09 (1H, s, 4'-OH), 4.18 (1H, s, OH), 4.29 (1H, s, 2'-OH), 4,43-4.50 (3H, m, 3'-H, 2×OH), 4.51 (1H, d, J 7.8, 1'-H), 4.67 (1H, d, J 9.7, 1-H), 5.10 (1H, s, OH), 7.22-7.29 (5H, m, Ar), 7.50 (2H, d, J 6.9, Ar), 7.82 (2H, d, J 8.2. Ar); δ_(C) 125.78 MHz, CDCl₃) 21.64 (CH₃), 61.29 and 61.55 (2 CH₂), 68.03, 68.27, 72.13, 74.24, 76.34, 78.46 and 82.85 (7 CH), 87.41 (1-C), 103.13 (1'-C), 128.00 (2 CH), 128.89 (3 CH), 129.90 (2 CH), 131.96 (2 CH), 132.94 (C, Ts), 133.22 (C, Ph), 144.94 (C, Ts); m/z (FAB⁺) 573 (M-CH₃)⁺, 1%!, 471 (M-117)⁺, 18!, 242 (M-346)⁺, 53!, 155 (M-433)⁺, 87!, 91 (CH₃ Ph⁺, 100); 11: a!²⁵ _(D) -14.9 (c 2.3 in MeOH); Rf 0.40 (MeOH/CH₂ Cl₂ 1:1); ν_(max) (CDCl₃)/cm⁻¹ 3500 (OH), 2960, 2880 (CH), 1599 (C═C), 1366, 1178 (SO₂); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CDCl₃) 2.43 (6H, s, 2×Me), 2.80 (1H, t, J 6.0, 6-OH), 3.19 (1H, d, J 2.2, 2-OH), 3.23 (1H, d J 4.6, 4'-OH), 3.38-3.44 (2H, m, 2-H, 5-H), 3.57-3.65 (2H, m, 3-H, 4-H), 3.83-3.90 (5H, m, 2'-H, 2'-OH, 5'-H, 6-Ha, 6-Hb), 4.04 (1H, dd, J 3.7, 3.9, 4'-H), 4.09 (1H, d, J 1.3, 3-OH), 4.17 (1H, dd, J 7.1, 10.6, 6'-Ha), 4.21 (1H, dd, J 5.3, 10.7, 6'-Hb), 4.43-4.47 (2H, m, 1'-H, 3'-H), 4.59 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.28-7.51 (7H, m, Ar), 7.51 (1H, d, J 1.7, Ar), 7.52 (1H, d, J 2.2, Ar), 7.78 (2H, d, J 8.3, Ar), 7.83 (2H, d, J 8.3, Ar); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CDCl₃) 21.64 (2 CH₃), 61.91 (CH₂), 67.11 (CH), 67.69 (CH₂), 68.29 (CH), 71.84 (CH), 71.91 (CH), 76.18 (CH), 78.16 (CH), 79.95 (CH), 82.08 (CH), 87.42 (1-C), 103... (1'-C), 128.03 (4 CH), 128.98 (2 CH), 130.02 (5 CH), 132.02 (C, Ts), 132.16 (C, Ts), 132.48 (2 CH), 132.72 (C, Ph), 145.39 (C, Ts), 145.53 (C, Ts); m/z (MALDI) Found: 765.1309 (MNA⁺), C₃₂ H₃₈ S₃ O₁₄ Na⁺ requires 765.1321.

Phenyl 2,3,6-tri-O-acetyl-4-O-(2',4',6'-tri-O-acetyl-3'-p-toluenesulfonyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 10:

Crude compound 9 (15.3 mg, <26 μmol) was stirred in pyridine/Ac₂ O 2:1 (300 μl), at room temperature for 20 hours. The reaction mixture was reduced in vacuo and chromatographed petroleum ether (b.p. 40°-60° C.)/ethyl acetate 1:1! leading to 10 as a colourless foam (14.2 mg, 65%): α!²⁵ _(D) -3.0 (c 0.9 in CHCl₃); Rf 0.26 petroleum ether (b.p. 40°-60° C.)/ethyl acetate 1:1!; ν_(max) (CHCl₃)/cm⁻¹ 2960, 2860 (CH), 1753 (C═O), 1599 (C═C), 1373, 1179 (SO₂), 1225 (C-O); δ_(H) (500 MHz, CDCl₃) 1.93, 2.01, 2.04, 2.05, 2.08, 2.11 (18H, 6×s, 6×Ac), 2.44 (3H, s, Me), 3.63 (1H, ddd, J 2.0, 5.7, 9.9, 5-H), 3.73 (1H, dd, J 9.6, 9.6, 4-H), 3.83 (1H, t, J 6.6, 5'-H), 4.05 (2H, d, J 6.7, 6'-Ha, 6'-Hb), 4.09 (1H, dd, J 5.8, 11.9, 6-Ha), 4.48 (1H, d, J 7.9, 1'-H), 4.51 (1H, dd, J 2.0, 11.9, 6-Hb), 4.67 (1H, d, J 10.1, 1-H), 4.72 (1H, dd, J 3.6, 10.1, 3'-H), 4.89 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 9.7, 2-H), 5.06 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 10.1, 2'-H), 5.20 (1H, dd, J 9.1, 9.1, 3-H), 5.45 (1H, d, J 3.5, 4'-H), 7.29-7.34 (5H, m, Ar), 7.46-7.48 (2H, m, Ar), 7.73 (2H, d, J 8.3, Ar); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CDCl₃) 20.50 (2 CH₃), 20.63 (CH₃), 20.76 (2 CH₃), 20.84 (CH₃), 21.68 (CH₃), 60.84 and 62.08 (2 CH₂), 67.24, 68.99, 70.24, 70.71, 73.79, 76.17, 76.32 and 76.61 (8 CH), 85.46 (1-C), 100.74 (1'-C), 127.98 (2 CH), 128.31 (CH), 128.88 (2 CH), 129.80 (2 CH), 131.74 (C, Ts), 132.90 (C, Ph), 133.03 (2 CH), 145.34 (C, Ts), 169.00, 169.39, 169.55, 169.63, 170.24 and 170.33 (6 CO); m/z (FAB⁺) 863 (MNa⁺, 6%), 841 (MH⁺, 3), 731 (M-SPh)⁺, 17!, 443 (M-397)⁺, 18!, 169 (M-671)⁺, 33!, 109 (PhS⁺, 34), 43 (CH₃ CO⁺, 100).

Phenyl 2,3,6-tri-O-acetyl-4-O-(2',4'-di-O-acetyl-3',6'-di-O-p-toluenesulfonyl-.beta.-D-galacto-pyranosyl)-1-deoxy-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 12:

11 (11.3 mg, 15 μmol) was treated as described for the synthesis of 10 to give 12 as a gum (14 mg, 97%): α!_(D) ²⁵ +1.8 (c 0.9 in CHCl₃); Rf 0.35 petroleum ether (b.p. 40°-60° C.)/ethyl acetate 1:1!; ν_(max) (CHCl₃)/cm⁻¹ 2950, 2880 (CH), 1756 (C═O). 1599 (C═C), 1373, 1179 (SO₂), 1225 (C-O); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CDCl₃) 1.91, 1.94, 1.98, 2.09, 2.10 (15H, 5×s, 5×Ac), 2.48 (6H, 2×s, 2×Me), 3.63 (1H, ddd, J 1.8, 5.5, 9.8, 5-H), 3.72 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 9.7, 4-H), 3.87 (1H, t, J 6.3, 5'-H), 3.98 (2H, d, J 6.3, 6'-Ha, 6'-Hb), 4.06 (1H, dd, J 5.6, 11.9, 6-Ha), 4.46 (1H, d, J 7.9, 1'-H), 4.50 (1H, dd, J 1.9, 12.0, 6-Hb), 4.67 (2H, d, J 10.1, 1-H and dd, J 2.1, 10.1, 3'-H), 4.88 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 9.7, 2-H), 5.03 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 10.2, 2'-H), 5.19 (1H, dd, J 9.1, 9.1, 3-H), 5.40 (1H, d, J 3.5, 4'-H), 7.29-7.32 (3H, m, Ar), 7.34 (2H, d, J 8.2, Ar), 7.38 (2H, d, J 8.2, Ar), 7.48 (2H, dd, J 2.5, 6.1, Ar), 7.72 (2H, d, J 8.3, Ar), 7.77 (2H, d, J 8.3, Ar); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CDCl₃) 20.34, 20.47, 20.68, 20.78 and 20.84 (5 CH₃), 21.70 (2 CH₃), 62.01 and 65.82 (2 CH₂), 67.26, 68.86, 70.30, 70.97, 73.63, 75.96, 76.18 and 76.54 (8 CH), 85.36 (1-C), 100.39 (1'-C), 127.98 (2 CH), 128.00 (2 CH) 128.26 (CH), 128.89 (2 CH), 129.85 (2 CH), 130.09 (2 CH), 131.77 and 132.15 (2 C, Ts), 132.88 (2 CH, 1C), 145.42 and 145.52 (2C, Ts), 168.95, 169.19, 169.50, 169.65 and 170.32 (5 CO); m/z (LSIMS) 843 (M-SPh)⁺, 5%!, 55 (M-397)⁺, 42!, 281 (M-671)⁺, 100!.

Phenylchlorosulfate 13:

A solution of phenol (17 g, 181 mmol) in dry toluene (380 ml) was stirred with sodium pieces (4.15 g, 180 mmol) in a 100° C. oil bath for 2 hours. When hydrogen formation had finished, the oil bath temperature was increased to 130° C. for two more hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0° C. transferred to a pressure equalising funnel and added slowly (1 h) to a cold (0° C.) solution of sulfuryl chloride (15 ml, 181 mmol) in toluene (50 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h, washed with H₂ O (3×100 ml), dried over Na₂ SO₄ and concentrated in vacuo leading to a brown oil which was distilled under reduced pressure through a Vigreux column (70°-72° C./100 μm Hg, lit.sup.(I3a) ; 61°-65° C./50 μm Hg) to give a fraction of colourless oil containing 13 and ˜10% penol (23.3 g, 67%), and a small fraction of pure I3 (1.17 g, 3%): ν_(max) (CDCl₃) 1587 (C═C). 1201 (SO₃); δ_(H) (200 MHz; CDCl₃) 7.34-7.57 (m, Ph); δ_(C) (50 MHz, CDCl₃) 121.69 (2 CH), 123.15 (C), 128.84 (CH), 130.28 and 130.42 (2 CH); m/z (EI) 194 (M⁺, 14%). 192 (M⁺, 38), 93 (M-SO₂ Cl)⁺, 33!, 65 (M-127)⁺, 100!.

Phenyl 1-deoxy-4-O-(6'-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 14:

8 (50 mg, 115 μmol) was treated as described for the synthesis of 9 and 11, but using PhSO₃ Cl (239 μl, 1.7 mmol) instead of p-toluenesulfonyl chloride. Chromatography (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1) gave the unreacted starting material and 14 (6.5 mg, 11%) as a white solid: m.p. 176° C. (dec.); Rf 0.27 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3427 (OH), 2923 (CH), 1255 (SO₃); δ_(H) (500 MHz, CD₃ OH) 3.29-3.31 (1H, m, 2-H), 3.46-3.89 (4H, m, 4'-H, 5'-H, 6-Ha, 6-Hb), 4.14 (1H, dd, J 10.08, 4.5, 6'-Ha), 4.24 (1H, dd, J 10.7, 7.9, 6'-Hb), 4.36 (1H, d, J 7.4, 1'-H), 4.65 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.25-7.32 (3H, m, Ph), 7.55-7.57 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CD₃ OD) 62.18 and 67.96 (2 CH₂), 69.95, 72.29, 73.33, 74.56, 74.76, 77.84, 80.38 and 81.33 (8 CH), 86.74 (1-C), 105.23 (1'-C), 128.52 (CH), 129.92 (2 CH), 133.03 (2 CH), 134.72 (C); m/z (ES⁻) 513 (M-H)⁻, 100%!.

Phenyl 1-deoxy-4-O-(3'-O-sulfo-β-D-galatopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside, sodium salt 15 and Phenyl 1-deoxy-4-O-(3',6',-di-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside, disodium salt 16:

8 (199 mg, 458 μmol) was stirred in refluxing MeOH (4 ml), with Bu₂ SnO (116.5 mg, 458 μmol) for 2 hours under nitrogen. The solvent was reduced in vacuo and the dry dibutylstannylene complex was treated with Me₃ N.SO₃ (132 mg, 920 μmol) in dioxane (4 ml) at room temperature for 30 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted with MeOH (3 ml), filtered and reduced in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in MeOH (3 ml) and loaded onto a cation exchange resin column (AG50W-X8, Na⁺, 1×4 cm). The products were eluted with MeOH, the eluant concentrated in vacuo and chromatographed (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:8:1) to give 15 (187.2 mg, 76%) and 16 (29.1 mg, 10%) as white solids: 15 α!²⁴ _(D) -26.2 (c 4.8 in MeOH); m.p. 215° C. (dec.); Rf 0.23 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:8:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3402 (OH), 2920, 2880 (CH), 1584 (C═C), 1250 (SO₃ ⁻); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.28 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 8.4, 2-H), 3.43-3.46 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.55 (1H, dd, J 8.7, 8.7, 3-H), 3.59 (1H, dd, J 9.6, 9.6, 4-H), 3.63 (1H, m, 5'-H), 3.68-3.73 (2H, m, 2'-H, 6'-Ha), 3.77 (1H, dd, J 11.5, 7.5, 6'-Hb), 3.85 (1H, dd, J 12.3, 4.1, 6-Ha), 3.91 (1H, dd, J 12.3, 2.5, 6-Hb), 4.21-4.25 (2H, m, 3'-H, 4'-H), 4.48 (1H, d, J 7.8, 1'-H), 4.62 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.24-7.32 (3H, m, Ph), 7.54-7.56 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CD₃ OD) 61.98 and 62.43 (2 CH₂), 68.55, 70.87, 73.41, 76.75 and 77.93 (5 CH), 80.51 (2 CH), 81.75 (CH), 89.12 (1-C), 104.82 (1'-C), 104.82 (1'-C), 128.44 (CH), 129.88 (2 CH), 133.01 (2 CH), 134.92 (C); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 513.0738 (M-Na)⁺ !, C₁₈ H₂₅ O₁₃ S₂ ⁻ requires 513.0737; 16: α!²⁴ _(D) -29.9 (c 1.5 in MeOH); m.p. 194° C. (dec.); Rf 0.13 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:8:1); ν_(max) (KBr) 3431 (OH). 2928 (CH), 1251 (SO₃): δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.33-3.35 (1H, m, 2-H), 3.51-3.54 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.61 (1H, dd, J 8.9, 8.9, 4-H), 3.65 (1H, dd, J 8.7, 8.7, 3-H), 3.75 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 9.6, 2'-H), 3.87 (1H, dd, J 4.4, 12.3, 6-Ha), 3.95 (1H, dd, J 2.5, 12.4, 6-Hb), 3.96-3.99 (1H, m, 5'-H), 4.16 (1H, dd, J 3.7, 10.8, 6'-Ha), 4.27 (1H, d, J 3.3, 4'-H), 4.29-4.36 (2H, m, 3'-H, 6'-Hb), 4.50 (1H, d, J 7.8, 1'-H), 4.72 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.28-7.36 (3H, m, Ph), 7.59-7.61 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD) 62.07 (6-C), 68.29 (6'-C, CH), 70.54, 73.20, 74.47, 77.81, 80.35, 81.31, 81.59 (7 CH), 88.35 (1-C), 105.02 (1'-C), 128.64 (CH, Ph), 129.98 (2 CH, Ph). 133.12 (2 CH, Ph), 134.46 (C, Ph): m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 615.0117 (M-Na)⁻ !, C₁₈ H₂₄ O₁₆ SNa⁻ requires 615.0124.

Phenyl 1-deoxy-4-O-(6'-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranosly)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 14, Phenyl 1-deoxy-4-O-(β-D-galactopyranosyl)-6-O-sulfo-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 17 and Phenyl 1-deoxy-6-O-sulfo-4-O-(6'-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 18:

A solution of 8 (50 mg, 115 μmol) in DMF (1 ml) was treated with Me₃ N.SO₃ (33 mg, 230 μmol) and stirred at room temperature for 4 days. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo and chromatographed (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:8:1) to give the unreacted starting material (6.3 mg, 13%) and 14 (10.2 mg, 17%), 17 (5.3 mg, 9%), 18 (10.6 mg, 15%); 17: Rf 0.22 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.26 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 8.8, 2-H), 3.50-3.51 (2H, m, 2'-H, 4'-H), 3.53 (1H, dd, J 8.8, 8.8, 3-H) 3.60 (1H, dd, J 9.1, 9.1, 4-H), 3.60-3.62 (1H, m, 5'-H), 3.66-3.69 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.69 (1H, dd, J 11.6, 4.8, 6'-Ha), 3.76 (1H, dd, J 11.5, 7.4, 6'-Hb), 3.81 (1H, d, J 1.4, 3'-H), 4.30 (1H, dd, J 11.0, 4.3, 6-Ha), 4.35 (1H, dd, J 11.0, 1.9, 6-Hb), 4.48 (1H, d, J 7.7, 1'-H), 4.58 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.23, 7.32 (3H, m, Ph), 7.55-7.59 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CD₃ OD) 62.49 and 67.51 (2 CH₂), 70.43, 72.75, 73.32, 74.82, 77.02, 77.88, 78.26 and 79.62 (8 CH), 88.99 (1-C), 104.65 (1'-C), 128.52 (CH), 129.89 (2 CH), 133.42 (2 CH), 134.59 (C); m/z (ES⁻) 513 (M-H)⁻ !; 18: m.p. 180° C. (dec.); Rf 0.16 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3435 (OH), 2922 (CH), 1251 (SO₃); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.28-3.31 (1H, m, 2-H), 3.52-3.57 (4H, m, 2'-H, 4'-H, 3-H, 4-H), 3.70-3.73 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.86 (1H, d, J 1.3, 3'-H), 3.88-3.90 (1H, m, 5'-H), 4.14 (1H, dd, J 10.7, 4.5, 6'-Ha), 4.24 (1H, dd, J 10.7, 8.0, 6'-Hb), 4.28 (1H, dd, J 11.0, 4.8, 6-Ha), 4.36 (1H, dd, J 11.0, 1.8, 6-Hb), 4.45 (1H, d, J 7.7, 1'-H), 4.62 (1H, d, J 9.8, 1-H), 7.24-7.32 (3H, m, Ph), 7.57-7.59 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CD₃ OD) 67.70 and 67.95 (2 CH₂), 69.99, 72.51, 73.17, 74.53, 74.75, 77.82, 78.16 and 81.16 (8 CH). 88.59 (1-C), 105.14 (1'-C), 128.55 (CH), 129.94 (2 CH), 133.30 (2 CH), 134.50 (C); m/z (ES⁻) 615 (MNa-2H)⁻, 54%!, 296 (M-2H)²⁻, 100!.

Phenyl 2-acetamido-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-1,2-di-deoxy-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 19:

To a solution of chloro 2-acetamido-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-α-D-glucopyranoside (844 mg. 2.31 mmol) in CH₃ CN (10 ml) was added thiophenyl (280 μl, 2.72 mmol) and Et₃ N (633 μl, 4.54 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred 1.5 hours at room temperature, filtered, concentrated in vacuo and chromatographed (AcOEt) leading to 19 as a white solid (968 mg, 95%): α!²⁴ _(D) -20.4 (c 3.3 in CHCl₃); m.p. 199° C.; Rf 0.35 (AcOEt); ν_(max) (CDCl₃)/cm⁻¹ 3287 (NH), 2960, 2880 (CH), 1747 (CH₃ C═O), 1687 (NHC═O), 1514 (NH), 1239 (C-O); δ_(H) (200 MHz; CDCl₃) 1.98, 2.00, 2.02, and 2.07 (12H, 4×s, 4×Ac), 3.73 (1H, ddd, J 3.0, 5.0, 10.5, 5-H), 4.04 (1H, ddd, J 10.0, 10.0, 10.0, 2-H), 4.17-4.21 (2H, m, 6-Ha, 6-Hb), 4.87 (1H, d, J 10.4, 1-H), 5.05 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 9.7, 4-H), 5.24 (1H, dd, J 9.7, 9.7, 3-H), 5.81 (1H, d, J 9.3, NH), 7.27-7.31 (3H, m, Ph), 7.47-7.52 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (50 MHz; CDCl₃) 20.39 (CH₃), 20.55 (2 CH₃), 23.12 (CH₃), 53.15 (2-C), 62.36 (6-C), 68.50, 73.66 and 75.61 (3 CH), 86.53 (1-C), 128.10 (CH, Ph), 129.03 (2 CH, Ph), 132.45 (2 CH, Ph), 132.76 (C, Ph), 169.61, 170.45, 170.88 and 171.21 (4 CO); m/z (CI) Found: 440.1379 (MH⁺), C₂₀ H₂₆ O₈ NS⁺ requires 440.1379.

Phenyl 2-acetamido-1,2-di-deoxy-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 20:

A solution of 19 (102.5 mg, 233 μmol) in MeOH (2 ml) was stirred with a 0.6M sodium methoxide solution (149 μl, 89 μmol) at room temperature for 0.5 hours. The reaction mixture was diluted with MeOH (5 ml) and neutralized with Amberlite-IR (H⁺) resin. The resin was removed by filtration and washed with MeOH. The filtrate and washings were reduced in vacuo leading to 20 as a white solid (72 mg, 99%): α!²³ _(D) +6.6 (c 0.8 in MeOH); m.p. 222° C.; Rf 0.50 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3360, 3287 (OH, NH), 2940, 2880 (CH), 1651 (C═O), 1541 (NH); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 2.02 (3H, s, Ac), 3.33-3.40 (2H, m, 4-H, 5-H), 3.49 (1H, dd, J 8.3, 9.8. 3-H), 3.71 (1H, dd, J 5.6, 12.1, 6-Ha), 3.79 (1H, dd, J 10.1, 10.1, 2-H), 3.90 (1H, dd, J 2.2, 12.2, 6-Hb), 4.81 (1H, d, J 10.4, 1-H), 7.26-7.33 (3H, m, Ph), 7.51-7.53 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD) 22.96 (CH₃), 56.28 (2-C), 62.86 (6-C), 71.83, 77.43 and 82.12 (3 CH), 88.38 (1-C), 128.17 (CH, Ph), 129.90 (2 CH, Ph), 132.11 (2 CH, Ph), 135.93 (C, Ph), 173.54 (CO); m/z (CI) Found: 314.1062 (MH⁺), C₁₄ H₂₀ O₅ NS⁺ requires 314.1062.

Phenyl 2-acetamido-1,2-di-deoxy-4-O-(β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 21:

20 (12.5 mg, 40 μmol) was sonicated with 50 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4, 1 ml) containing MnCl₂ (2 mM), and NaN₃ (6 mM) for 15 min. To the white suspension were added BSA (0.9 mg), CIAP (7 U), UDP-glucose (29.9 mg, 48 μmol). UDP-galactose 4-epimerase (4 U) and β-galactosyltransferase (1.07 U). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37° C., after 17 hours the clear solution was reduced in vacuo and the residue chromatographed twice (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1, then MeOH/CHCl₃ 1:4) affording 21 as a white solid (11.3 mg, 60%): α!²³ _(D) +8.3 (c 0.9 in H₂ O); m.p. 228° C.; Rf 0.35 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3409, 3300 (OH, NH), 2940, 2880 (CH), 1646 (C═O), 1548 (NH); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 2.01 (3H, s, Ac), 3.46-3.47 (1H, m, 5-H). H), 3.50 (1H, dd, J 3.2, 9.7, 3'-H), 3.55 (1H, dd, J 7.5, 9.7, 2'-H), 3.60 (1H, dd, J 4.6, 7.5, 5'-H), 3.66-3.68 (2H, m, 3-H, 4-H), 3.70 (1H, dd, J 4.5, 11.5, 6'-Ha), 3.78 (1H, dd, J 7.5, 11.5, 6'-Hb), 3.83 (1H, d, J 3.2, 4'-H), 3.85-3.89 (2H, m, 2-H, 6-Ha), 3.94 (1H, dd, J 2.5, 12.3, 6-Hb), 4.41 (1H, d, J 7.5, 1'-H), 4.81 (1H, d, J 10.5, 1-H), 7.27-7.33 (3H, m, Ph), 7.50-7.52 (2H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD) 22.92 (CH₃), 55.69 (2-C), 62.00 and 62.54 (2 CH₂), 70.34, 72.60, 74.83, 75.59, 77.17, 80.52 and 80.67 (7 CH), 88.49 (1-C), 105.03 (1'-C), 128.31 (CH, Ph), 129.93 (2 CH, Ph), 132.32 (2 CH, Ph), 135.74 (C, Ph), 173.37 (CO); m/z (DCI) 476 (MH⁺, 5%), 366 (M-SPh)⁺, 36!, 204 (M-271)⁺, 100!.

Phenyl 2-acetamido-3,6-di-O-acetyl-4-O-(2',6'-di-O-acetyl-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1,2-di-deoxy-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside 22:

A solution of 21 in pyridine/Ac₂ O 2:1 (300 μl) was stirred at room temperature for 45 h, reduced in vacuo and chromatographed (MeOH/CHCl₃ 1:9) leading to 22 (1.2 mg, 28%): Rf 0.22 (MeOH/CHCl₃ 1:9); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CDCDl₃) 1.98, 2.07, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.13 (15H, 5×s, 5×Ac), 3.60-3.66 (2H, m, 3'-H, 5'-H), 3.67 (1H, dd, J 2.2, 6.2, 5-H), 3.73 (1H, dd, J 9.1, 9.1, 4-H), 3.85 (1H, d, J 3.4, 4'-H), 4.10-4.18 (2H, m, 2-H, 6-Ha), 4.23 (1H, dd, J 6.3, 11.4, 6'-H), 4.37 (1H, dd, J 6.4, 11.7, 6'-Hb), 4.38 (1H, d, J 7.7, 1'-H), 4.53 (1H, dd, J 2.1, 11.7, 6-Hb), 4.70 (1H, d, J 10.4, 1-H), 4.86 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 9.7, 2'-H), 5.08 (1H, dd, J 8.7, 9.9, 3-H), 5.68 (1H, d, J 9.5, NH), 7.28-7.31 (3H, m, Ph), 7.47-7.49 (2H, m, Ph); m/z (DCI) 664 (MH⁺, 58%), 534 (M-SPh)⁺, 95%!, 168 (M-475)⁺, 100!.

Phenyl 2-acetamido-1,2-di-deoxy-4-O-(3'-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranosyl)-1-thio-β-D-glucopyranoside, sodium salt 23:

21 (43 mg, 90 μmol) was treated as described for the synthesis of 15 using THF (43 h) instead of dioxane to give 23 as a white solid (43.2 mg, 83%): α!²⁴ _(D) -13 (c 2.9 in MeOH); m.p. 205° C. (dec.); Rf 0.10 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:10:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3403 (OH, NH), 2940, 2880 (CH), 1557 (Ph), 1651 (C═O), 1557 (NH), 1250 (SO₃ ⁻); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 2.00 (3H, s, Ac), 3.44 (1H, ddd, J 2.6, 4.0, 9.1, 5-H), 3.62-3.66 (3H, m, 3-H, 4-H, 5'-H), 3.66-3.73 (2H, m, 2'-H, 6'-Ha), 3.76 (1H, dd, J 7.5, 11.5, 6'-Hb), 3.84-3.88 (2H, m, 2-H, 6-Ha), 3.92 (1H, dd, J 2.5, 12.3, 6-Hb), 4.22 (1H, d, J 3.2, 4'-H), 4.25 (1H, dd, J 3.2, 9.7, 3'-H), 4.51 (1H, d, J 7.8, 1'-H), 4.79 (1H, d, J 10.5, 1-H), 7.22-7.30 (3H, m, Ph), 7.47-7.89 (2H, m, PH); δ_(C) (50 MHz; CD₃ OD) 22.25 (CH₃), 55.01 (2-C), 61.91 and 61.38 (2 CH₂), 68.06, 70.35, 75.12 and 76.18 (4 CH), 80.05 (2 CH), 81.13 (3'-C), 87.86 (1-C), 104.25 (1'-C), 127.94 (CH, PH), 129.62 (2 CH, Ph), 131.87 (2 CH, Ph), 135.32 (C, Ph), 173.33 (CO); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 554.0999 (M-Na)⁺ !, C₂₀ H₂₈ O₁₃ S₂ ⁻ requires 554.1002.

Methyl 3-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranoside, sodium salt 25:

Methyl β-D-galactopyranoside 24 (100 mg, 515 μmol) was treated as described for the synthesis of 15 using THF (15 h) instead of dioxane and the product converted to its sodium salt by using MeOH/CHCl₃ 1:1 as solvent. Chromatography (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1) gave 25 as a white gum (142 mg, 93%): α!²³ _(D) +8.3 (c 3.6 in MeOH); Rf 0.16 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3436 (OH), 2947 (CH), 1251 (SO₃); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.53 (3H, s, OMe), 3.56 (1H, dd, J 6.09, 6.09, 5-H), 3.67 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 8.8, 2-H), 3.74 (1H, d, J 5.5, 6-Hb), 3.75 (1H, d, J 6.6, 6-Ha), 4.22-4.25 (3H, m, 1-H, 3-H), 4-H); δ_(C) (50 MHz, CD₃ OD) 55.80 (CH₃), 60.93 (CH₂), 67.16, 69.30, 74.91 and 80.58 (4 CH), 104.37 (1-C); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 273.0276 (M-Na)⁻ !, C₇ H₁₃ O₉ S⁻ requires 273.0280.

Methyl 2,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-3-O-sulfo-β-D-galactopyranoside, sodium salt 26:

A solution of 25 (17.4 mg, 59 μmol) in Ac₂ O/pyridine 1:2 (450 μl) was stirred for 2 hours and reduced in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in toluene (2 ml) and reduced again to give a white solid (24 mg, 97%); Rf 0.47 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 4:5:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 2925 (CH), 1737 (C-O), 1263 (SO₃, C-O); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CDCl₃) 1.95, 2.00 and 2.11 (9H, 3×s, 3×Ac), 3.51 (3H, s, OMe), 3.84 (1H, dd, J 11.1, 11.1, 5-H), 4.31 (1H, d, J 10.0, 6-Ha), 4.71 (1H, d, J 8.1, 1-H), 4.83 (1H, dd, J 3.2, 10.5, 3-H), 5.01 (1H, d, J 11.5, 6-Hb), 5.14 (1H, dd, J 8.3, 10.2, 2-H), 6.04 (1H, broad s, 4-H); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz, CDCl₃) 14.17, 20.26, 21.05 and 21.13 (4 CH₃), 56.42 (6-C), 69.57, 70.01, 70.36 and 75.08 (4 CH), 101.04 (1-C), 168.28, 169.82 and 173.09 (3 CO); m/z (ES⁻) 399 (M-Na)⁻, 100%!.

3-O-sulfo-β-D-galactosylceramide, sodium salt 3 and 3,6-di-O-sulfo-β-D-galactosylceramide, disodium salt 28:

Galactosylceramide 27 (41.8 mg, 51 μmol) was sulfated as described for 25 using 1.5 equivalent of Bu₂ SnO then stirring with Me₃ N.SO₃ at room temperature for 4 hours. The residue was chromatographed twice (MeOH/CHCl₃ 1:4 then MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:10:1) to give 3 as a white solid (45.2 mg, 97%) and a trace of 28; 3: α!²³ _(D) +2.6 (c 1.0 in MeOH); m.p. 184° C. (dec.); Rf 0.35 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:10:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3435 (OH, NH), 2920, 2851 (CH), 1635 (C═O), 1556 (NH), 1250 (SO₃); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD/CDCl₃ 1:1) 0.85 (6H, t, J 6.9, 2×CH₃), 1.20-1.35 (54H, m, 27×CH₂), 1.54-1.56 (2H, m, NHCOCH₂ CH₂). 1.97-2.00 (6H, m, 3×CH═CHCH₂), 2.13-2.16 (2H, t, J 7.7, NHCOCH₂), 3.55 (1H, dd, J 5.9, 5.9, 5-H), 3.61 (1H, dd, J 3.0, 10.3, OCHaHbCNH), 3.70-3.80 (3H, m, 6-Ha, 6-Hb, 2-H), 3.95-3.98 (1H, m, CHNH), 4.07 (1H, dd, J 7.7, 7.7, CHOHCNH), 4.14 (1H, dd, J 4.7, 10.3, OCHaHbCNH), 4.24-4.27 (2H, m, 3-H, 4-H), 4.32 (1H, d, J 7.7, 1-H). 5.30 (2H, t, J 4.7, cis CH═CH), 5.41 (1H, dd, J 7.6, 15.3, CHOHCHa═CHb), 5.66 (1H, dt, J 7.2, 15.3, CHOHCHa═CHb), 7.67 (1H, d, J 9.2, NH); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD/CDCl₃ 1:1) 14.33 (2 CH₃), 23.20 (2 CH₂), 26.61 (CH₂), 27.68 (2 CH₂), 29.87, 29.94 and 30.29 (23 CH₂), 32.49 (2 CH₂), 32.98 (CH₂), 37.02 (CH₂), 53.99 (CH), 61.89 (CH₂), 68.02 (CH), 69.50 (CH₂), 70.23, 72.39, 75.41 and 80.94 (4 CH), 103.98 (1-C), 130.04 (C═), 130.37 (C═C), 134.87 (C═), 175.45 (CO); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 888.6240 (M-Na)⁻ !, C₄₈ H₉₀ NO₁₁ S⁻ requires 888.6235; 28: Rf 0.18 (MeOH/CHCl₃ /H₂ O 5:10:1); ν_(max) (KBr)/cm⁻¹ 3435 (OH,NH), 2921, 2851 (CH), 1630 (C═O), 1560 (NH), 1252 (SO₃); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD/CDCl₃ 1:1) 0.85 (6H, t, J 6.9, 2×CH₃), 1.23-1.32 (54H, m, 27×CH₂), 1.53-1.56 (2H, m, CH₂ CH₂ CONH), 1.97-2.00 (6H, m, 3×CH₂ CH═CH), 2.14 (2H, t, J 7.7, CH₂ CONH), 3.56 (1H, dd, J 2.9, 10.3, CHaHbCNH), 3.73 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 9.5, 2-H) 3.81 (1H, dd, J 6.4, 6.4, 5-H), 3.96-3.98 (1H, m, CHNH), 4.06 (1H, dd, J 7.8, CHOHCNH), 4.13-4.23 (3H, m, CHaHbCNH, 6-Ha, 6-Hb), 4.25-4.31 (2H, m, 3-H, 4-H), 4.33 (1H, d, J 7.7, 1-H), 5.30 (2H, t, J 4.7, cis CH═CH), 5.41 (1H, dd, J 7.6, 15.3, CHOHCHa═CHb), 5.66 (1H, dt, J 6.7, 15.3, CHOHCHa═CHb), 7.74 (1H, d, J 8.0, NH); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 990.5659 (M-Na)⁻ ! and 968.5781 (MH-2Na)⁻ !, C₄₈ H₈₉ NO₁₄ S₂ Na⁻ requires 990.5622 and C₄₈ H₉₀ NO₁₄ S₂ ⁻ requires 968.5803.

Benzyl 4-O-(4'-,6'-O-benzylidene-2'-O-sulfo-α-D-glucopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranoside 30:

29 (54 mg, 104 μmol) was sulfated as described for 15 and chromatographed using CH₂ Cl₂ :MeOH (8:2) giving 30 as a white gummy solid (54 mg, 87%): α!²³ _(D) +26.0 (c 1.0 in MeOH); Rf 0.40 (CH₂ Cl₂ /MeOH 8:2); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 3.34-3.35 (1H, m, 2-H), 3.40-3.43 (1H, m, 6-H), 3.59 (1H, t, J 9.5, 4'-H), 3.69-3.79 (4H, m, 3-H, 6-Hb, 6'-H), 3.86-3.89 (1H, m, 5'-H), 3.90-3.94 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.97 (1H, t, J 9.6, 3'-H), 4.26 (1H, dd, J 10.1, 4.8, 4-H), 4.33 (1H, dd, J 9.6, 4.0, 2'-H), 4.41 (1H, d, J 7.9, 1-H), 4.79 (2H, dd, J 12.7, 11.8, PhCH₂), 5.59 (1H, s, PhCH), 5.76 (1H, d, J 4.01, 1'-H), 7.25-7.51 (10H, m, PhCH₂, PhCH); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD) 62.63, 64.43, 69.69, 70.00, 71.75, 74.80, 76.30, 77.76, 78.20, 79.55, 82.35, (2-C, 3-C, 4-C, 5-C, 6-C, 2'-C, 3'-C, 4'-C, 5'-C, 6'-C, PhCH₂), 98.96, 102.95, 103.06, (1-C, 1'-C, PhCH), 127.51, 128.68, 129.02, 129.17, 129.27, 129.92, 139.04 (PhCH₂, PhCH); m/z (ES⁻) 599 (M-H)⁻, 100%!.

Tert-butyl allyl 4-O-(4',6'-O-benzylidene-2'-O-sulfo-α-D-glucopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranosid!uronate 32:

31 (55 mg, 100 μmol) was sulfonated as described for 15 to give 32 as a colourless gum (34 mg, 54%): Rf 0.33 (CH₂ Cl₂ /MeOH 8:2); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 1.52 (9 H, s, C(CH₃)₃), 3.27 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 9.3, 2-H), 3.54 (1H, t, J 9.3, 4'-H), 3.69-3.74 (3H, m, 5'-H, 6'-H), 3.77 (1H, dd, J 8.9, 9.0, 3-H), 3.81 (1H, d, J 9.6, 5-H), 3.89 (1H, t, J 9.5, 3'-H), 3.95 (1H, dd, J 8.9, 9.3, 4-H), 4.13-4.17 (1H, m, OCH₂), 4.24-4.32 (2 H, m, 2'-H, OCH₂), 4.40 (1H, d, J 7.9, 1-H), 5.15-5.17 (1H, m, CH═CH₂), 5.30-5.34 (1H, m, CH═CH₂), 5.56 (1H, s, PhCH), 5.89 (1H, d, J 4.0, 1'-H), 5.91-5.99 (1 H, m, CH═CH₂), 7.31-7.46 (5 H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD) 28.54 C(CH₃)₃ !, 69.50 and 71.47 (6'-C, OCH₂), 63.90, 69.82, 74.35, 76.63, 77.06, 77.70, 79.31 and 82.27 (2-C, 3-C, 4-C, 5-C, 2'-C, 3'-C, 4'-C, 5'-C), 83.73 (CMe₃), 98.09, 103.01 and 103.76 (1-C, 1'-C, PhCH), 117.69 (OCH₂ CH═CH₂), 127.54, 128.99 and 129.91 (5 CH, Ph), 135.47 (OCH₂ CH═CH₂), 139.06 (C, Ph), 169.16 (C═O); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 619.1708 (M-H)⁻ !, C₂₆ H₃₅ O₁₅ S⁻ requires 619.1697.

Allyl 4-O-(4',6'-O-benzylidene-2'-O-sulfo-α-D-glucopyranosyl)-6-O-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-β-D-glucopyranoside 34:

33 (50 mg, 86 μmol) was sulfated as described for 15 and stirred with Me₃ N.SO₃ for 93 hours at room temperature. Chromatography (CH₂ Cl₂ /MeOH 8:2) gave 34 as a colourless gum (32 mg, 52%): Rf 0.44 (CH₂ Cl₂ /MeOH 8:2); α!²⁵ _(D) +32.23 (c 1.03 in MeOH); δ_(H) (500 MHz; CD₃ OD) 0.11 and 0.12 (6 H, 2s, SiMe₂), 0.92 (9 H, s, tBu), 3.23 (1H, dd, J 8.1, 8.6, 2-H), 3.35-3.38 (1H, m, 5-H), 3.58 (1H, t, J 9.5, 4'-H), 3.72-3.77 (3H, m, 3-H, 4-H, 6'-Ha), 3.86-3.98 (4H, m, 3'-H, 5'-H, 6-H), 4.11-4.16 (1H, m, OCH₂), 4.23 (1H, dd, J 4.8, 10.1, 6'-Hb), 4.29 (1H, dd, J 4.0, 9.6, 2'-H), 4.30-4.33 (1H, m, OCH₂), 4.33 (1H, dd, J 7.9, 1-H), 5.14-5.33 (2H, m, CH═CH₂), 5.59 (1H, s, PhCH), 5.83 (1H, d, J 4.0, 1'-H), 5.92-5.99 (1H, m, CH═CH₂), 7.32-7.50 (5H, m, Ph); δ_(C) (125.78 MHz; CD₃ OD) -4.89 and -4.81 (SiMe₂), 19.38 (CMe₃), 26.58 (CMe₃), 63.81, 69.73 and 70.89 (6-C, 6'-C, OCH₂ -CH═CH₂), 64.48, 69.89, 74.73, 76.39, 76.84, 78.38, 79.52 and 82.44 (2-C, 3-C, 4-C, 5-C, 2'-C, 3'-C, 5'-C), 98.78, 102.83 and 103.02 (1-C, 1'-C, PhCH), 117.52 (OCH₂ CH═CH₂), 127.57, 128.99 and 129.95 (5 CH, Ph), 135.69 (OCH₂ CH═CH₂), 139.04 (C, Ph); m/z (FAB⁻) Found: 663.2149 (M-H)⁻ !, C₂₈ H₄₂ O₁₄ SiS⁻ requires 663.2143.

As mentioned above, sulfated saccharides and glycoconjugates, in which one or several of the hydroxyl or amino groups of the sugar are esterified as sulfate esters are abundant in biological systems. Examples of such structures include sulfate glycolipids (for example 3), sulfated glycosaminoglycans, such as heparin, heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate, dermatan sulfate or keratan sulfate (see, for example, Lander, A. D., Chemistry & Biology, 1, 73-78, 1994), and some blood group antigens, such as sulfated Lewis^(x) and Lewis^(a) antigens, which may be either attached to proteins or lipids (see, for example, the first-mentioned papers by Yuen et al). It is interesting to note that the sulfated Lewis antigens may have similar biological activity to those Lewis antigens containing a sialic acid at the same position of the sugar.

These sulfated saccharides have important roles in diverse biological processes, such as cell adhesion, cell proliferation, angiogenesis, cell differentiation, cell invasion or cell attachment (see, for example, Lander, loc cit). Such processes have physiological significance in a diverse range of scientific and clinical areas, such as blood coagulation, cancer, atherosclerosis, inflammation, wound healing and degenerative nervous system diseases. Compounds that selectively mimic or inhibit these processes may therefore have considerable therapeutic importance. Such compounds may either be partial structures of sulfated oligosaccharides or analogues of such structures. One of the challenges in this area is the chemical synthesis of these complex molecules. Although advances have been made in this area (see, for example, Lubineau, et al, loc cit, and Nicolaou, et al, loc cit), the syntheses are long and low yielding due to the need for complex protection group strategies.

The present methodology of regioselective sulfation has the advantage that it requires little protection and therefore substantially reduces the number of synthetic steps. For example, the classical synthesis of compound 23 from 21 requires five steps, while the present methodology converts 21 to 23 in one high-yielding step. Since it requires few protecting groups it may be used in combination with enzymatic methodologies as demonstrated in above Scheme 6: 21 is first made enzymatically from 20, then regioselectively sulfated to 23. It has been shown that 23 is a substrate for a fucosyltransferase, which then gives the sulfo-Lewis^(x) antigen structure (see, for example, Chandrasekaran, et al, loc cit).

The present sulfation methodology does not only give access to 3-sulfated galactosides, but may also be used to sulfate other positions, such as illustrated in above Scheme 4 (8 to 14) and above Table 1 (29 to 30). It may be used in the presence of a number of functional groups, such as acetals (29), allylic alcohols (27), silyl ethers (33), amides (27) and esters (31). So far it has been applied particularly to saccharides and glycolipids, but it is also applicable to glycopeptide synthesis, given its tolerance for functional groups.

The present methodology may be used to make natural compounds (such as 3) and it may be applied to the synthesis of useful novel compounds (such as 14, 15, 16, 23, 25, 30, 32 and 34). 

We claim:
 1. An organic molecule represented by the following formula: ##STR16## wherein R is H or SO₃ H, and R' is H or SO₃ H.
 2. An organic molecule represented by the following formula: ##STR17##
 3. An organic molecule represented by the following formula: ##STR18## wherein when R is Bn, R' is CH₂ CH; and when R is alkyl, R' is CO₂ tert-Bu or CH₂ OSitert-BuMe₂.
 4. An organic molecule as claimed in claims 1, 2, or 3 wherein it is conjugated to a larger molecule. 